patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Scotch Plains Fanwood High School Ranked #60 by NJ Monthly Magazine

Several other local schools made the list, including New Providence High School, which was ranked #1 in the state among public high schools.

 

Just days after The Star Ledger’s Inside New Jersey selected Scotch Plains Fanwood High School as one of the state's “Top Performing High Schools,” New Jersey Monthly Magazine places the school at #60, up just two  notches from its 2010 ranking at #62. 

Nearby New Providence High School claimed the top spot. So, just what contributed to its high marks?

“The school’s average class size is down sharply since the 2010 rankings, and its math scores in the High School Proficiency Assessment (HSPA) have improved significantly. This at a time of state budget cuts and local belt-tightening,” according to the NJ Monthly Magazine article, featured in the September issue, which hits newstands on Aug. 28.

NJ Monthly mades changes to its methodology this year, including a new graduation-rate calculation, eliminating student/computer ratio as a factor and increasing the weighting for data on test results, according to the article announcing the top public high schools.

In addition to Scotch Plains-Fanwood and New Providence, several other area high schools were ranked as follows:

New Jersey Monthly Magazine Top Public High Schools

Name 2012 Ranking 2010 Ranking
Summit 15 25
Jonathan Dayton 26 40
Governor Livingston 36 24
A.L. Johnson 40 101
Cranford 51 13
Scotch Plains 60 62
Chatham 20 8
Roselle Park 122 190
David Brearley 127 113
Elizabeth 148 294
Hillside 166

217

 

The categories and indicators used in the ranking, listed on NJ Monthly Magazine's web site, are as follows:

School Environment: The sum of the standardized rank scores for average class size; student/faculty ratio; percentage of faculty with advanced degrees; and number of AP tests offered, which was calculated as a ratio of grade 11 and 12 enrollment in order not to penalize smaller schools. (Senior class size is shown in the published charts for reference only; it is not part of the ranking calculation.)

Student Performance: The sum of the standardized rank scores for average combined SAT score; percentage of students showing advanced proficiency on HSPA; and students scoring a 3 or higher on AP tests as a percentage of all juniors and seniors.

Student Outcomes: A single score based on a new graduation-rate calculation (four-year adjusted cohort graduation rate) introduced by New Jersey in 2011, as mandated by the federal government. Essentially, the adjusted cohort formula divides a school’s number of four-year graduates by the number of first-time ninth-graders who entered the cohort four years earlier. For further information, visit state.nj.us/education/data/.

Vocational schools: Schools defined in this category by the state Department of Education were ranked using the same methodology as other public schools, but with two exceptions. No average class size is available for these schools, since many students are shared with mainstream schools. Similarly, there is insufficient data on AP tests.

Special Notes: Some schools were missing only AP-related data, particularly the number of students who scored a 3 or higher on AP tests. For these schools (which had fewer than 10 students who took an AP test) a value was imputed for purposes of the ranking using an average of other schools in their DFG. Also, for certain districts where there were obvious errors in the data (Midland Park, Elizabeth and Paterson), corrections were obtained directly from the districts.

Related Topics: High School Rankings and NJ Monthly

cnewman

9:15 pm on Thursday, August 23, 2012

i am not impressed with the ranking at all. not even in the top 50. I would like to know how ranking compares to other towns cost per child? does the no comments here mean nobody is paying attention, that everyone is on vacation or do you all have money to burn with your tax dollars?

Reply

haljalikea kick

9:49 pm on Thursday, August 23, 2012

No one should be impressed - it looks like out of 48 or so "I districts "- SPF rated # 35!! That is nothing to BRAG about!!!

Reply

Beats Me

10:19 pm on Thursday, August 23, 2012

Our HSPA-language score looks pretty low, and we don't seem to offer as may AP tests as higher-ranking towns, but I don't know what the root of the problem is. Maybe at the next Board of Ed meeting someone can ask them what they think contributed to the ranking and how to fix it.

Actually the whole list seems a little wack. Johnson in Clark went from 101 to 40 in 2 years and is almost on par with Gov Livingston and Randolph? Well, if you say so...

Here's an additional resource to find out more about the state's schools using other criteria: http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/sdds/ed/index.asp?st=NJ

Reply

ciccio

2:02 pm on Friday, August 24, 2012

I wouldn't pay much attention to these rankings. School are ranked very erratically from year to year suggesting that there are many faults in their system. Not that it should be thrown out all together though. Its always good to look at performance in a critical manner and get some outside feedback.

Reply

Leave a comment