patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices

Sneak Attack on Toxic Site Cleanups & Public Health

Last week the DEP had a private meeting for Licensed Site Remediation Professionals (LSRPs) on proposed changes to groundwater and vapor intrusion standards when it comes to toxic sites.  The proposed changes are a major roll back in environmental protections and public health standards for people who would be living and working on contaminated properties.  The stakeholder process for this change has been dominated by industry developers and their hired consultants.  This is the first major change in standards since the LSRP program has been put in place. 

This is a sneak attack on public health.  The rollback of protective standards on environmental cleanups is a giveaway to developers and polluters at the expense of the people of New Jersey. These changes are not based on science; they are based on political science.  This is the Christie administration’s ongoing attack on the environment.

Having strict groundwater and vapor standards are critically important in a state like New Jersey with over 20,000 contaminated sites.  The clean up or remediation of these sites affects not only the people that end up living or working on top of them, but adjoining properties as well.  By weakening cleanup standards, it enriches the developers and polluters by costing them less to clean up and remediate at the expense of the environment and public health.  While the responsible parties and developers save money on cleanup costs the people who live and work in these areas will be spending more on health care.

Of the proposed changes to groundwater standards, 27 of them weaken protections, increasing the amount of toxic chemicals that are allowed to stay in groundwater.  There are only 8 changes were they actually decrease the amount of pollution allowed and those are mostly based on changes in federal standards.  We are weakening where we can and only strengthening where required to do so by EPA.

For vapor and soils in non-residential development, including parks and play grounds, we are weakening standards and increasing the amount of pollution for 69 chemicals and only decreasing amount of pollution for 6.  For vapor and soil in residential we are weakening standards for 23 chemicals while strengthening standards in 18.  The better protections again can be attributed to updated EPA standards. 

Many of these chemicals that we are weakening standards for have been studied by the state with science on why we need to be more restrictive and decrease the amount of chemicals.  Yet they are proposing standards to increase the amount of toxic chemicals in the environment. 

The chemicals in groundwater end up under people’s homes or in their basements and they end up breathing them in as they evaporate and become vapors.  That is why having vapor and groundwater standard are so important; they are one of the leading causes of ingestion of toxic chemicals that have major health consequences.  For instance there is a higher rate than normal of lung cancer in Jersey City as people breathe in chromium vapors as studied by the NJ Department of Health. The weakening of these standards and adding more toxins into our homes has a direct impact on public health, especially children, whether it is in their home or playing on their lawns.

New Jersey is supposed to be a million to one cancer risk for exposure to toxic chemicals.  It is not only in our drinking water legislation but it is in our toxic site cleanup legislation as well.  We believe with a lot of these changes we are weakening those scientific health based standards.  Instead we are setting in place standards that are there to benefit polluter and developers. 

By weakening and politicizing science and stacking boards with polluters that have a conflict of interest you get around New Jersey’s protective, science and health based laws.  There has not been any peer reviewed, scientific evidence or papers for the reductions of these standards.  Just the opposite, the original standards were set by peer reviewed scientific research that was protective of human health.

They are weakening standards for acetone which is a carcinogen and neurotoxin, carbon tetrachlorine which affects the kidney and nervous system and is a carcinogen, dichlorolbenzene which bioaccumlates in our fatty tissue and is a carcinogen, and trichloroethane which affects the central nervous system and is linked to birth defects.   These are just some of the proposed roll backs. 

At a time when the science is showing smaller and smaller concentrations of chemicals have a bigger impact to health and the dangers from vapor intrusion, we are actually weakening standards instead of increasing health protections.

These changes will impact toxic sites across the state from Pompton Lakes and Lodi to Garfield, Newark, Bridgewater, Mantua, and Camden. 

This change in standards is part of the ongoing attack by the Christie administration on the environment and sound science; now standards that are supposed to be protective of the public health are under attack.  They are siding with industry and special interests over the people of New Jersey.  This is part of the Governor’s Executive Order 2, allowing no rule stricter than federal standards.  The Governor has downgraded the DEP Division of Science to an Office run by a political appointee instead of scientist.  He has stacked the DEP Science Advisory Board with industry representatives and is now trying to stack the Drinking Water Quality Institute.  The head of the Drinking Water Quality Institute resigned in protest and they have not met in two years. 

When we have industry writing standards and regulating themselves this is part of the outcome.  They get to weaken standards, write their cleanup plans, oversee the cleanup and sign off that the site is clean.

George Clark

7:24 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

sounds like what the stock markets been doing. writing their own tickets at all our expenses. when will nj residents wake up? i know. when it's too late. that's when.

Reply

David Henry

1:52 am on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

I agree wholeheartedly with Jeff. The public's health needs to be protected and the government has a responsible to help protect us.

Dave Henry, Princeton Health Officer

Reply
Comment_arrow

Pundit

8:42 am on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Sorry, I am torn between my deep concerns for the environment and my pure hatred for anything Jeff Tittle advocates. He is using the environment only as a soapbox to promote his fat self. After reading his rant about plastic grocery bags, I stopped recycling the ones I get just to annoy Jeff! Sierra Club needs to dump Jeff ASAP or at least shut him up..

Comment_arrow

Richard Hall

9:35 am on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Yes, but a distinction needs to be made between industrial pollution and a little oil from a residential tank that gets into groundwater a few feet below grade. We have been trying for 7 years to remediate a leak though bioremediation without jeopardizing our house with excavation. Enough is enough.

Comment_arrow

foggyworld

1:53 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Only from Princeton do we routinely hear, Damn the costs and the middle class. Full speed ahead.

I have spoken

2:00 am on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Was it REALLY a private meeting, or Maybe Jeff is upset that he and his group of nut-job fanatics (AKA The Sierra Club) wasn't invited?

Reply
Comment_arrow

foggyworld

1:50 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

They should be so happy that the Governor appointed one of them - rather than a torn up resident - to his big Sandy Commission!

Al McDorman

9:48 am on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

So the non-smoker babies of the future get more pre-natal birth defects, more post-natal brain damage (ever hear of ADD's prominence these days?), and lung cancer. The question is, WHO CARES? Yes, that really is the question. There's little enough to keep people in this hurricane-ravaged state with an economy rivaling Nevada and Michigan's as it is. A responsible citizen might strongly consider cutting his or her own losses and move before the bells ring for thine own. Again, the Q! What will be, will be.

Reply

Rosemary Bruno

6:22 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Water is the basic necessity for all life. There is nothing like a refreshing glass of water. I desire a glass of water with no added carcinogenics for my loved ones and me, now and for all future generations. This is certainly more important than the profits of some company.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Pundit

9:55 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Besides you, who knew water was the basic necessity for life? I never heard that before. May I quote you? Thank you for your original thoughts.

BN

10:03 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

When the Sierra Club goes after geoengineering, then I'll take them seriously.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Project Bluebeam

4:21 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

And Monsanto. Can't bite the hand that feeds you though.

Bob R

3:35 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

Take a drive by the Rt. 33 and Rt. 35 intersection in Neptune on a wet day with your windows open and you will smell the pungent aroma of kerosene. Turn towards the ocean onto Rt. 33 between that intersection and Atkins Ave. and the smell is REALLY pungent. Did somebody forget to empty and remove the the gas tanks from the two gas stations that were on that corner and now are leaking toxins into the groundwater there??? The new middle school was constructed nearby....are those kids now drinking toxic water in that school? The smell has been there for years...at least 10 that I remember....but not a word....why?

Reply
Comment_arrow

I have spoken

6:08 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Drive down Shafto road. Smell the aroma. No wonder they named it SHAFT-O Road. The pople in that area really got the shaft.

WMS826

10:13 pm on Friday, February 15, 2013

How much money are you making off this non profit Jeffy boy while you work so hard to put the rest of us out of work and on welfare.

Lets have an audit of these folks, lets see how much you cavort with politicians and are part of the political machine and no longer an activist.

Reply

Joe T

10:13 am on Saturday, February 16, 2013

http://sierraclubfoundation.org/sites/sierraclubfoundation.org/files/TSCFauditedfinancialstatements2011-public.pdf

wonder if any of the mutual funds owns any Exxon or Apple stock? Look closely and you will see investments in hedge Funds, you know the one's that are evil for the economy.

Jeff probably doesn't realize the electricity he uses for his PRIUS is made from COAL!

Reply
Comment_arrow

foggyworld

1:47 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Joe, you have to understand that he feels he is special because he is part of the named by themselves, Elite. Ditto the Sierra Club which is biased beyond belief because it is beholding to some of the strangest donors in the land.

Tugwalla

1:41 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013

Patch....this is not a local voice! This guy is paid by a national special interest group to post their propaganda. You should charge him for advertising!

Reply

foggyworld

1:44 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Dear Patch,

This is really hand-out journalism. If you intend to keep printing every one of his precious words would it be too much to ask that in large letters you print the name of the group he is associated with because it really is the least we the readers should know. This is the blue lands Sierra Club guy who wants the middle class shoved out of western Barnegat Bay. He has a right to speak but not from any pulpit which is what this feels like.

Many thanks for your consideration.

Reply

Leave a comment