.

Should the Board of Education Elections Be Moved to November? BOE Discusses.

Vote in the poll to voice your opinion on this matter. The BOE will hold a special meeting on February 9 to discuss and reach a conclusion. Here is a detailed account of what an election date move could mean for SPF.

At Thursday’s Board of Education meeting, the Board announced that due to recent Election Law legislation, the BOE has until February 17 to decide whether or not to move the Board of Education election from April to November.

The Board engaged in an intense debate regarding a decision that could save the district $27,000 – 30,000, but would take away the public’s opportunity to vote in favor or against the school budget, as long as the BOE remains inside the 2 percent cap. Here is how the new election law works as explained in a presentation delivered by BOE President, Trip Whitehouse:

  • The Senate and General Assembly passed this bill with a bipartisan majority. It was signed into law by Governor Christie on January 17. Other municipalities in the area, including Cranford have already passed BOE legislation to move the election to November.
  • The election can be moved in several ways:
    • The school board can enact a resolution to move the election.
    • The Town Council can do the same. In this community, the Fanwood Borough Council and the Scotch Plains Council will both have to vote in favor for the election in order to move to November.
    • A public vote can take place if 15 percent of SPF voters who voted in the last Presidential election sign a petition to move the election date.
  • If the BOE election date is moved to November, it will remain in November for a minimum of four years.
  • If necessary, special elections can still take place in January, March, September and December. April is not an option.
  • If the election is moved to November, the public will no longer have the opportunity to vote on the school budget UNLESS the budget exceeds the two percent cap. In that case, the public has the right to vote on the school budget in the November election.
  • If the election date moves, the November ballot will serve as not only the opportunity for voters to vote in political elections (i.e. the Presidential election) but also for the BOE candidates. These elections will be run by the county, meaning that the district would accrue a savings of at least $27,000 dollars a year.
  • When possible, the county will make an effort not to list the BOE candidates next to Democratic or Republican candidates to avoid politicizing the Board of Education.

While the budget will still be crafted in April, if for some reason the district should need to apply for additional funds, the school budget will not be approved until the next school year in November. This will limit how extra funds can be allocated for the 2012-2013 school year.

Despite these proposed changes, the BOE noted that the public will still have the opportunity to attend public hearings at each school to learn about the proposed school budget. While there will be no public vote, the budget must still be approved by the County Superintendent and the state.

If the election date is moved to November, voter engagement will jump from 18 percent, to 44 percent. Since the Board can automatically pass the budget if it remains within the 2 percent cap, there is no risk of program cuts, as the budget could no longer be defeated by the public.

The Board spent much of last night’s meeting debating this change. Some members, expressed a concern that if the Board chose not to move the election, the cost of holding an April School Board election would spike.

BOE Vice President, Nancy Bauer explained that the more towns that choose to move the election to November (which again, would be paid for by the county instead of the district), the less aid Scotch Plains-Fanwood would receive from the state and the county to fund an election.

Perhaps the most contentious topic of this debate was the fear that if the BOE election was moved to November, the BOE would become politicized due to the chance that candidates would feel the pressure to align themselves with a political party up for election.

“Moving the Board of Education elections to November would make it 10 times more likely that candidates will to align themselves with a political party,” BOE member, Betty Anne Woerner expressed. “In my nine years on the Board of Education, that has never happened and that is invaluable. We spend our time here productively, focusing on what’s best for the schools, instead of arguing politics.”

BOE members David Gorbunoff, Jeanne Cleary, and Dr. Karen Kulikowski, all expressed that moving the election date from April to November would not make a difference in the political expression of the BOE.

“While I believe that the partisanship concern exists, I think that it is outweighed by the savings and increased voter involvement this change would bring,” Cleary said. “Other districts are partisan - and underperforming because of it - and they were elected in April.”

BOE member Douglas Layne noted that if his election had been in November, he probably would have chosen not to run, stating that he likes not knowing the political persuasions of his fellow BOE members.  He also expressed that those who want to run to help their community, such as active PTA members, run regardless of political party, and that a November election may discourage them to run.  

Layne also noted that while the pool of voters in an April election is smaller, those are the voters who are informed and care about the future and wellbeing of the district. A larger number of uniformed voters may not necessarily be better, he said.

BOE member Amy Winkler expressed that a Board of Education election in November might get “lost in the fray,” while many other BOE members added that a November election could change the way candidates run. In a town where BOE candidates don’t spend money on lawn signs or mailers to get elected, some BOE members feared that that may change in November.

After a long debate, Trip Whitehouse announced that the Board will hold a special meeting on February 9, at 8 p.m., to discuss this matter. There will be time allotted for public comment and if the Board reaches the conclusion to move the election to November, they will vote that night and pass a resolution. If not, the BOE will announce their decision to leave the election in April.

To let the BOE know how you feel about this issue, send an email to the Board at boe@spfk12.org before the February 9 meeting. Whitehouse requested that when contacting the BOE, send an email to that address because emails sent to individual BOE members may or may not be reviewed at public meetings, at that member’s discretion.

What do you think? Engage in your democracy! Should Board of Education elections in Scotch Plains-Fanwood be moved to November? Tell us in the comments and voice your opinion in the poll below. Board members will review the poll results as well to help get an idea of where the community stands on this issue.

Tom Russo January 27, 2012 at 09:30 PM
My concern about moving the election to November is not that the Board candidates will align themselves with political parties but rather that the local politicians will get involved with the school election by either endorsing or criticizing candidates. I would hate to see the BOE or any Board member be beholding to a Mayor and Council. Mayors have tried to exert that influence in the past but thankfully have been rebuffed.
Michael Lewis January 28, 2012 at 04:32 PM
Arguments in favor of moving the voting to November center around cost, administrative efficiency and “greater participation in the process”. Putting aside the fact that the process is itself being watered down, what this boils down to is: “Trust us – we know what we are doing with your children and your money.” To which I would reply, "Trust but verify". Oddly, in our district it IS currently – but may not always be – true (for the most part). Other points besides efficiency need to be considered in limiting a vote on the budget. First , the 2% cap is NOT a hard cap. Healthcare costs are not included, and the cap itself is applied on the levy BEFORE it is applied to SP and Fanwood. This is not anything sinister but needs to be communicated. Time spent framing a school budget is NOT time wasted. It imposes a discipline on our Board and its Administration to justify themselves every year. I would passionately argue – especially at a time when so many problems in the private sector are being ascribed to a laissez-fair attitude toward management and corporate governance – that this is a good thing. Budget defeats – when they occur – should be taken for what they are: A necessary part of the feedback loop conveying that something IS out of balance in terms of outcomes, cost or value. (continued...)
Michael Lewis January 28, 2012 at 04:33 PM
(...continues from above) And if something IS systemically out of balance? It is difficult to get people to run for School Board elections even now, let alone achieve the diversity of viewpoints necessary to properly reflect our two communities. I would argue – if nothing else – that the advantages accruing to incumbency resulting from a move of the election to November, when combined with a limitation on budget voting and an electorate trying to deal with multiple issues would result in a more bureaucratic, sclerotic system of education that currently exists. At a time when the electorate is repeatedly presented with politically-negotiated “done deals”, and gerrymandering precludes true electoral change, it is imperative that avenues of electoral engagement be maintained and not eliminated. Voting should remain in April.
Barbara Roskin January 28, 2012 at 04:42 PM
This article states: “When possible, the county will make an effort not to list the BOE candidates next to Democratic or Republican candidates to avoid politicizing the Board of Education.” The phrase “when possible” should generate serious concern with taxpayers. If school elections are moved from April to Nov., a ballot MUST be developed listing Board of Ed candidates separately to avoid any semblance of political affiliation. Additionally, as stated, a Nov. election eliminates taxpayers from voting on the school budget. Accordingly, it is incumbent on each of us, as always, to attend and/or read written accounts of budget presentations and Board of Ed meetings where information and other viewpoints may resolve your concerns. Barbara Roskin
Emily Everson January 29, 2012 at 01:17 AM
Hi Michael - your letter to the editor has been published on Patch. You can see it here http://patch.com/A-q238
DAM February 06, 2012 at 12:54 AM
Even in an "off-year" election in November, the voter turn-out well exceeds the paltry 15-20% which bothers to show up in April ... the subject of education, teachers, and school boards and administration has already been politicized by Trenton ... "trust and verify" is overkill, intended for nuclear stockpile inspection; the operation of our school district is conducted in a far more transparent and honest means than that ... most persons affiliated with our district have probably declared a political party affiliation as well, as a legitimate part of voter registration ... the shift to November from April makes too much common sense: do it ...
Michael Lewis February 06, 2012 at 02:00 PM
Putting aside for a moment anything that goes on in any given district, all too often what needs to be changed within the broader educational establishment goes beyond a local school board; when questions are raised one hears that "our hands are tied". Electoral change in Trenton is very difficult (and the process of educational regulation VERY MUCH politicized), but when over 50% of a state's school budgets go down it gets everyone's attention that SOMETHING needs to be addressed constructively (notwithstanding that a budget vote should reflect only local concerns). It does not happen in a vacuum. Sometimes messages need to be sent, need to be heard, and bear repeating. Take away avenues by which that might be achieved, and whatever change does come may be far more drastic, and damanging locally, than might otherwise be the case. I fully agree that our current board is committed to a reasonable degree of transparency and diversity of views - we are fortunate - but the discipline of the current system reinforces it precisely because in a budget vote anything CAN happen. That most budgets are viewed as reasonable is a credit to everyone involved with the process. When they are not, something has to be examined. If the ability to convey that fact is taken away (as is being proposed in most instances), all one is left with is the Board vote, and that being the case, the results there may work against considered discussion of local concerns.
Aristotle February 10, 2012 at 01:49 PM
Mr. Festa, Bank of America has no say in this. Our BOE was going to vote last night.
Frank J. Festa February 10, 2012 at 02:16 PM
"Watchung goes first: election day now Nov. 6" "The K-8 Board of Education voted 7-2 Tuesday, Jan. 31, to move school election day from April to November for the next four years." The Scotch Plains Fanwood BOE should try it!
Barney Oldfield February 10, 2012 at 02:26 PM
I've heard that the SPF BOE voted 8-1 to move the elections to November.
John Jacob February 10, 2012 at 02:32 PM
@ Aristotle - Funny comment. I laughed when I saw it. Especially since the poster served on the "BOA" at one time. He seems a little late to the rodeo, but better late than never. :)
Emily Everson February 10, 2012 at 02:40 PM
The BOE did in fact vote 8-1 to move the School Board Elections to November 15. Working on an update to this story. Stay tuned.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something